For the second time in less than a week reports of Facebook removing pictures it deems profane or demeaning have people slamming the social networking titan

From Fake News
Revision as of 03:07, 13 July 2020 by Teamanimal25 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "On [https://writeablog.net/bodyclaus46/do-nude-nudist-image-sites-really-boost-the-ideals-of-naturism blondes on a beach] , the Daily Mail reported that Facebook got rid of a...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

On blondes on a beach , the Daily Mail reported that Facebook got rid of a photo of a girl sitting in a bathtub with her elbows leaning on the sides of the bath. blondes on a beach mentioned the picture broken the Statement of Rights and Responsibilities, which says: "You aren't going to upload material that: is hate language, threatening, or mature; incites physical violence; or contains nudity or gratuitous or graphic physical violence.".


Based on naturism , it will get rid of pictures "if they consist of nudity, substance abuse or another profane content. If nudism attacks an additional specific or team, it will be gotten rid of too.".
The picture was released by the web publication Notions of the Profound Comprehension of Things as a test of Facebook's policy of erasing obscene images. Within beach blondes of the publishing, Facebook erased the image because it believed the elbows were actually chests according to Gawker.
Theories released on it's Facebook page: ""So, below's last evening's FB alertness evaluation outcomes: FB mediators can not advise an elbow from a dangerous, unclean, amazing and violent female breast.)