Lets look at the advantages and disadvantages of rental and builtin webdisk

From Fake News
Jump to: navigation, search

Let's consider the advantages and disadvantages of rental and built-in webhard.

Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This identifies a service that shares idc's server resources with other users.

Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.

The rental type gets the benefit of having a server on idc, so that it does not have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low.

However, you should pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, purchase capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.

There are disadvantages such as dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) and other domains.


Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to build services, freeing up capacity and traffic.

It gets the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies usually do not use rental solutions. Webhard is not just a Webhard, it is a company.

It is because it is confidential and knows the energy of strategic sharing and well-managed data.


Link hard solutions have emerged based on the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without any burden.
It does not need to purchase H/W separately, and the solution alone allows users to build Webhard by utilizing the required pc, NAS, and server equipment.
If you already had a website or intranet, it is possible to stop unnecessary work that used to run the site.

웹하드 순위 OK to set up installed blogs or bulletin boards.

By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the business's homepage in addition to the Webhard's original function, the idea of developing a use-oriented product makes one look forward to the expansion of the answer.

The price is also from 300,000 won for 30 people, which may be fully built in Soho, therefore the parts that have been agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will undoubtedly be solved a lot.


It is now necessary for Soho to determine a web hard system.

Rental vs. Construction.


Webhard reminds you of an extremely useful and convenient Online sites that allows you to download files over the Internet at a fixed monthly cost. Which means that the utilization of web hard has become common.



But it's not just recently that this concept arrived, and it's true that it is been a long time. As soon as it came out, lots of people used it, and there were many office workers who didn't sign up for it or even paid for their personal expenses due to lack of capacity, and you can find probably still some now.



The biggest background of the phenomenon may be the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as work used, while there are lots of burdens and inconveniences to cover monthly expenses based on limited capacity. In addition, the service is provided against the backdrop of a large portal, which also results in security concerns about the leakage of confidential information, which explains why the company refuses to adopt it.


In some cases, there are also many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet up with the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server includes a server (HW)+ operating-system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses in line with the number of users), that is prohibitive compared to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.



NAS offers a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anybody with significantly reduce the needs of the webhard users. Webhard is very innovative because it supports uploading files automagically. It's a really good feature because DDNS, etc. could be accessed from the outside and never have to buy an authorized IP.



Unfortunately, there are functional limitations as the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. Because the word "basic" implies, it's not a webhard solution developed at a high cost. Because of this, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Needless to say, it is a paid option, but it's a very low-cost, very useful solution that's less than a tenth of the expense of building a single server.


Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low cost, creating a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll check out the rough top features of Webhard and guide you. You can go over it and choose the right one in line with the reality and needs.