Lets look at the benefits and drawbacks of rental and builtin down site
Let's consider the pros and cons of rental and built-in webhard.
Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This refers to a service that shares idc's server resources with other users.
p2p 순위 Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.
The rental type has the benefit of having a server on idc, so that it does not have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low.
However, you have to pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, purchase capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.
There are disadvantages such as dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) along with other domains.
Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to create services, freeing up capacity and traffic.
It has the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies usually do not use rental solutions. Webhard is not just a Webhard, it's a company.
It is because it is confidential and knows the energy of strategic sharing and well-managed data.
Link hard solutions have emerged based on the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without any burden.
It does not have to purchase H/W separately, and the solution alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the required pc, NAS, and server equipment.
If you already had a website or intranet, it is possible to stop unnecessary work that used to run the site.
OK to create installed blogs or bulletin boards.
By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the company's homepage in addition to the Webhard's original function, the idea of creating a use-oriented product makes one anticipate the expansion of the answer.
The price can be from 300,000 won for 30 people, which can be fully built in Soho, so the parts which have been agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will be solved a lot.
It is now essential for Soho to establish a web hard system.
Rental vs. Construction.
Webhard reminds you of a very useful and convenient Internet service that allows you to download files over the Internet at a fixed monthly cost. This means that using web hard has become common.
But it's not just recently that this concept arrived, and it's true that it is been a long time. When it came out, lots of people used it, and there were many workers in offices who didn't join it or even covered their personal expenses due to lack of capacity, and you can find probably still some now.
The biggest background of the phenomenon may be the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as for example work used, while there are lots of burdens and inconveniences to pay monthly expenses predicated on limited capacity. Furthermore, the service is provided contrary to the backdrop of a large portal, which also leads to security concerns about the leakage of confidential information, which explains why the company refuses to adopt it.
In some cases, there are also many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet up with the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server includes a server (HW)+ operating system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses in line with the number of users), that is prohibitive compared to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.
NAS offers a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anybody with significantly decrease the needs of these webhard users. Webhard is very innovative because it supports uploading files by default. It's a really good feature because DDNS, etc. can be accessed from the outside without needing to buy an authorized IP.
Unfortunately, you can find functional limitations because the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. As the word "basic" implies, it isn't a webhard solution developed at a high cost. As a result, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Of course, it is a paid option, but it's a very low-cost, very useful solution that's less than a tenth of the expense of building a single server.
Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low cost, developing a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll check out the rough top features of Webhard and guide you. It is possible to go over it and choose the right one in line with the reality and needs.